Agreeing and disagreeing in the iliad. An analysis of κατα μοιραν and κατ’ αισαν ss discourse markers
In recent years, the validity of applying specific parameters taken from the pragmatics of language theory to the Homeric poems, and classical languages,has been widely proved. This work is another attempt to demonstrate that this kind of approach allows comprehending more deeply t...
Guardado en:
| Autor Principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | spa |
| Publicado: |
AADEC - UNL
2015
|
| Acceso en línea: | https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/argos/article/view/9205 |
| id |
oai:bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar:article-9205 |
|---|---|
| recordtype |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar:article-92052021-06-11T18:10:16Z Agreeing and disagreeing in the iliad. An analysis of κατα μοιραν and κατ’ αισαν ss discourse markers ACUERDO Y DESACUERDO EN LA ILÍADA. UN ANÁLISIS DE KATA MOIPAN Y KAT’AI ΣAN COMO MARCADORES DISCURSIVOS Marinoni, Betiama P. In recent years, the validity of applying specific parameters taken from the pragmatics of language theory to the Homeric poems, and classical languages,has been widely proved. This work is another attempt to demonstrate that this kind of approach allows comprehending more deeply the persuasive discourses in the Iliad. In fact, the main purpose of this study is to observe the prepositional clauses κατὰ μοῖραν and κατ’ αἶσαν working as discourse markers. In doing so, we will try to better understand the reason why a rebuke is persuasively successful beyond the truthfulness of its statements about the traditional regulatory framework. En los últimos años, la validez de aplicar parámetros específicos de la teoría de la pragmática del lenguaje a los poemas homéricos, y a las lenguas clásicas, ha sido ampliamente comprobada. También este trabajo intenta demostrar que este tipo de abordaje permite una comprensión más profunda de los discursos persuasivos de la Ilíada. En efecto, el propósito del presente estudio es observar la utilización de los sintagmas preposicionales κατὰ μοῖραν y κατ’ αἶσαν como marcadores discursivos. Así, buscamos analizar por qué una reprimenda logra el éxito persuasivo al margen de la verdad enunciada acerca del código de conducta tradicional. AADEC - UNL 2015-05-13 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion artículo Articulo info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo Peer-reviewed Article application/pdf https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/argos/article/view/9205 10.14409/argos.v2i38.9205 Argos; Vol. 2 Núm. 38 (2015): Argos; 64-83 Argos; Vol 2 No 38 (2015): Argos; 64-83 Argos; v. 2 n. 38 (2015): Argos; 64-83 1853-6379 0325-4194 10.14409/argos.v2i38 spa info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/ https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/argos/article/view/9205/12487 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Derechos de autor 2020 Argos http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional del Litoral |
| collection |
Publicaciones periódicas |
| language |
spa |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| description |
In recent years, the validity of applying specific parameters taken from the pragmatics of language theory to the Homeric poems, and classical languages,has been widely proved. This work is another attempt to demonstrate that this kind of approach allows comprehending more deeply the persuasive discourses in the Iliad. In fact, the main purpose of this study is to observe the prepositional clauses κατὰ μοῖραν and κατ’ αἶσαν working as discourse markers. In doing so, we will try to better understand the reason why a rebuke is persuasively successful beyond the truthfulness of its statements about the traditional regulatory framework. |
| author |
Marinoni, Betiama P. |
| spellingShingle |
Marinoni, Betiama P. Agreeing and disagreeing in the iliad. An analysis of κατα μοιραν and κατ’ αισαν ss discourse markers |
| author_facet |
Marinoni, Betiama P. |
| author_sort |
Marinoni, Betiama P. |
| title |
Agreeing and disagreeing in the iliad. An analysis of κατα μοιραν and κατ’ αισαν ss discourse markers |
| title_short |
Agreeing and disagreeing in the iliad. An analysis of κατα μοιραν and κατ’ αισαν ss discourse markers |
| title_full |
Agreeing and disagreeing in the iliad. An analysis of κατα μοιραν and κατ’ αισαν ss discourse markers |
| title_fullStr |
Agreeing and disagreeing in the iliad. An analysis of κατα μοιραν and κατ’ αισαν ss discourse markers |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Agreeing and disagreeing in the iliad. An analysis of κατα μοιραν and κατ’ αισαν ss discourse markers |
| title_sort |
agreeing and disagreeing in the iliad. an analysis of κατα μοιραν and κατ’ αισαν ss discourse markers |
| publisher |
AADEC - UNL |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| url |
https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/argos/article/view/9205 |
| _version_ |
1706985886912086016 |
| score |
11.8626 |