Vista MARC: PHILOSOPHY AND ERISTIC IN PLATO AND ARISTOTLE. ON THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN BEING GENUINELY PROBLEMATIZED AND TALKING FOR THE PLEASUREOF TALKING

PHILOSOPHY AND ERISTIC IN PLATO AND ARISTOTLE. ON THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN BEING GENUINELY PROBLEMATIZED AND TALKING FOR THE PLEASUREOF TALKING

In this paper I attempt to shed light on the distinction between philosophy and eristic in Plato and Aristotle by turning my attention to the notion of aporia. In section I on the basis of an examination of the occurrences of eristikos in Meno, I try to show that Socrates appears closely connected w...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor Principal:	Marcos, Graciela E.
Formato:	Artículo revista
Lenguaje:	spa
Publicado:	AADEC - UNL 2015
Acceso en línea:	https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/argos/article/view/9196

id	oai:bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar:article-9196
recordtype	dspace
spelling	oai:bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar:article-91962021-06-11T17:19:31Z PHILOSOPHY AND ERISTIC IN PLATO AND ARISTOTLE. ON THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN BEING GENUINELY PROBLEMATIZED AND TALKING FOR THE PLEASUREOF TALKING FILOSOFÍA VS. ERÍSTICA SEGÚN PLATÓN Y ARISTÓTELES: ACERCA DE LA DISTINCIÓN ENTRE ESTAR PROBLEMATIZADO Y HABLAR POR EL GUSTO DE HABLAR Marcos, Graciela E. In this paper I attempt to shed light on the distinction between philosophy and eristic in Plato and Aristotle by turning my attention to the notion of aporia. In section I on the basis of an examination of the occurrences of eristikos in Meno, I try to show that Socrates appears closely connected with the eristic, who is usually portrayed as his most dangerous opponent. In section II, I analyse Aristotle’s taxonomy of the opponents of the principle of non-contradiction in Metaphysics IV in order to clarify the distinction between philosophers who are in genuine perplexity and eristics who look for verbal victory. At this point, I argue, Aristotle follows closely Plato’s teachings in Meno. En este artículo pretendo echar luz sobre la distinción entre filosofía y erística en Platón y Aristóteles, dirigiendo la atención a la noción de aporía. En la sección I, sobre la base de un examen de las ocurrencias de eristikós en Menón, intento mostrar que Sócrates aparece estrechamente conectado al erístico, quien suele ser presentado como su oponente más peligroso. En la sección II, analizo la taxonomía de Aristóteles de los opositores al principio de no-contradicción en Metafísica IV, con el fin de aclarar la distinción entre filósofos, genuinamente problematizados, y erísticos, que buscan la victoria verbal. En este punto, sostengo, Aristóteles sigue de cerca las enseñanzas de Platón en Menón. AADEC - UNL 2015-05-12 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion artículo Articulo info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo Peer-reviewed Article application/pdf https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/argos/article/view/9196 10.14409/argos.v1i38.9196 Argos; Vol. 1 Núm. 38 (2015): Argos; 7-29 Argos; Vol 1 No 38 (2015): Argos; 7-29 Argos; v. 1 n. 38 (2015): Argos; 7-29 1853-6379 0325-4194 10.14409/argos.v1i38 spa info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/ https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/argos/article/view/9196/12478 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Derechos de autor 2020 Argos http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
institution	Universidad Nacional del Litoral
collection	Publicaciones periódicas
language	spa
format	Artículo revista
description	In this paper I attempt to shed light on the distinction between philosophy and eristic in Plato and Aristotle by turning my attention to the notion of aporia. In section I on the basis of an examination of the occurrences of eristikos in Meno, I try to show that Socrates appears closely connected with the eristic, who is usually portrayed as his most dangerous opponent. In section II, I analyse Aristotle’s taxonomy of the opponents of the principle of non-contradiction in Metaphysics IV in order to clarify the distinction between philosophers who are in genuine perplexity and eristics who look for verbal victory. At this point, I argue, Aristotle follows closely Plato’s teachings in Meno.
author	Marcos, Graciela E.
spellingShingle	Marcos, Graciela E. PHILOSOPHY AND ERISTIC IN PLATO AND ARISTOTLE. ON THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN BEING GENUINELY PROBLEMATIZED AND TALKING FOR THE PLEASUREOF TALKING
author_facet	Marcos, Graciela E.
author_sort	Marcos, Graciela E.
title	PHILOSOPHY AND ERISTIC IN PLATO AND ARISTOTLE. ON THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN BEING GENUINELY PROBLEMATIZED AND TALKING FOR THE PLEASUREOF TALKING
title_short	PHILOSOPHY AND ERISTIC IN PLATO AND ARISTOTLE. ON THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN BEING GENUINELY PROBLEMATIZED AND TALKING FOR THE PLEASUREOF TALKING
title_full	PHILOSOPHY AND ERISTIC IN PLATO AND ARISTOTLE. ON THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN BEING GENUINELY PROBLEMATIZED AND TALKING FOR THE PLEASUREOF TALKING
title_fullStr	PHILOSOPHY AND ERISTIC IN PLATO AND ARISTOTLE. ON THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN BEING GENUINELY PROBLEMATIZED AND TALKING FOR THE PLEASUREOF TALKING
title_full_unstemmed	PHILOSOPHY AND ERISTIC IN PLATO AND ARISTOTLE. ON THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN BEING GENUINELY PROBLEMATIZED AND TALKING FOR THE PLEASUREOF TALKING
title_sort	philosophy and eristic in plato and aristotle. on the distinction between being genuinely problematized and talking for the pleasureof talking
publisher	AADEC - UNL
publishDate	2015
url	https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/argos/article/view/9196
_version_	1706985885661134848
score	11.8626

PHILOSOPHY AND ERISTIC IN PLATO AND ARISTOTLE. ON THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN BEING GENUINELY PROBLEMATIZED AND TALKING FOR THE PLEASUREOF TALKING

Ejemplares similares