Finitude and Truth. Gadamer on critical understanding
By showing the implications of Gadamer’s concepts of “anticipation of completeness” (Vorgriff der Vollkommenheit) and “effective history” (Wirkungsgeschichtlichen), as well as the relationship between them, the author attempts to explain why in Gadamer’s philosophy the traditional hermeneutical prob...
Guardado en:
| Autor Principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | spa |
| Publicado: |
ARFIL y UNL
2019
|
| Acceso en línea: | https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/8664 |
| id |
oai:bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar:article-8664 |
|---|---|
| recordtype |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar:article-86642021-03-29T11:33:54Z Finitude and Truth. Gadamer on critical understanding Finitud y Verdad. Gadamer sobre la comprensión crítica Fernández Membrive, Miguel By showing the implications of Gadamer’s concepts of “anticipation of completeness” (Vorgriff der Vollkommenheit) and “effective history” (Wirkungsgeschichtlichen), as well as the relationship between them, the author attempts to explain why in Gadamer’s philosophy the traditional hermeneutical problem of a more adequate understanding of “others” is subordinated to the problem of the possible truth of what these others say. At the same time, the author suggests that this latter problem and the dialogic framework that Gadamer assumes is the only possibility for dealing with it constitute the most important key for understanding the differences between his thinking and the hermeneutical tradition that came before it, including –in spite of his direct influence – Martin Heidegger. Al mostrar las implicaciones de los conceptos gadamerianos de “anticipación de la perfección” (Vorgriff der Vollkommenheit) e “historia efectual” (Wirkungsgeschichtlichen), así como la relación que mantienen entre sí, el autor se propone explicar por qué en la filosofía de Gadamer el tradicional problema hermenéutico de una más adecuada comprensión de los “otros” queda subordinado al problema de la posible verdad de lo que éstos dicen. Asimismo, el autor sugiere que este último problema y el marco dialógico que Gadamer presupone como única posibilidad de afrontarlo, constituyen la clave principal para entender las diferencias entre su pensamiento y la tradición hermenéutica que lo precede, incluido –pese a su influencia directa- Martin Heidegger. ARFIL y UNL 2019-11-12 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion artículo Articulo info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo application/pdf https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/8664 10.14409/topicos.v0i37.8664 Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe; Núm. 37 (2019): Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe; 28-53 Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe; No 37 (2019): Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe; 28-53 1668-723X 1666-485X 10.14409/topicos.v0i37 spa info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/ https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/8664/12091 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Derechos de autor 2019 Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional del Litoral |
| collection |
Publicaciones periódicas |
| language |
spa |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| description |
By showing the implications of Gadamer’s concepts of “anticipation of completeness” (Vorgriff der Vollkommenheit) and “effective history” (Wirkungsgeschichtlichen), as well as the relationship between them, the author attempts to explain why in Gadamer’s philosophy the traditional hermeneutical problem of a more adequate understanding of “others” is subordinated to the problem of the possible truth of what these others say. At the same time, the author suggests that this latter problem and the dialogic framework that Gadamer assumes is the only possibility for dealing with it constitute the most important key for understanding the differences between his thinking and the hermeneutical tradition that came before it, including –in spite of his direct influence – Martin Heidegger. |
| author |
Fernández Membrive, Miguel |
| spellingShingle |
Fernández Membrive, Miguel Finitude and Truth. Gadamer on critical understanding |
| author_facet |
Fernández Membrive, Miguel |
| author_sort |
Fernández Membrive, Miguel |
| title |
Finitude and Truth. Gadamer on critical understanding |
| title_short |
Finitude and Truth. Gadamer on critical understanding |
| title_full |
Finitude and Truth. Gadamer on critical understanding |
| title_fullStr |
Finitude and Truth. Gadamer on critical understanding |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Finitude and Truth. Gadamer on critical understanding |
| title_sort |
finitude and truth. gadamer on critical understanding |
| publisher |
ARFIL y UNL |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| url |
https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/8664 |
| _version_ |
1695661217759100928 |
| score |
11.8626 |