Imagen de Portada

The Reception of the Wissenschaft der Logik in the Argentinean philosophy (1932 - 1956)

The reception of G. W. F. Hegel's Wissenschaft der Logik in Argentine philosophy was late and focal. The almost null attention to the speculative aspect of Hegelian philosophy during nineteenth-century positivism was followed by a superficial interest in the first decades of the twentieth centu...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor Principal: Figueredo Núñez, Hugo Alberto
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:spa
Publicado: ARFIL y UNL 2021
Acceso en línea:https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/10196
id oai:bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar:article-10196
recordtype dspace
spelling oai:bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar:article-101962022-05-04T11:41:31Z The Reception of the Wissenschaft der Logik in the Argentinean philosophy (1932 - 1956) La recepción de la Wissenschaft der Logik en la filosofía argentina (1932 – 1956) Figueredo Núñez, Hugo Alberto The reception of G. W. F. Hegel's Wissenschaft der Logik in Argentine philosophy was late and focal. The almost null attention to the speculative aspect of Hegelian philosophy during nineteenth-century positivism was followed by a superficial interest in the first decades of the twentieth century, which resulted in two commentaries on the Wissenschaft der Logik: La Lógica de Hegel by M. A. Virasoro (1932) and Hegel y la dialéctica by C. Astrada (1956). For Virasoro the work represented a logical position opposed to the formal one with gnoseological and metaphysical derivations; for Astrada it exposed the foundation of the dialectical method, which had ontological and political relevance. Both philosophers coincided in a critical interest in the work and in an exegetical privilege of the Doctrine of Being over the Essence and the Concept. The differences and continuities between the two interpretations shaped the initial reception of the Wissenschaft der Logik in Argentine philosophy. La recepción de la Wissenschaft der Logik de G. W. F. Hegel en la filosofía argentina fue tardía y focal. A la casi nula atención al aspecto especulativo de la filosofía hegeliana durante el positivismo decimonónico, continuó un superficial interés en las primeras décadas del siglo XX que derivó en dos comentarios de la Wissenschaft der Logik: La Lógica de Hegel de M. A. Virasoro (1932) y Hegel y la dialéctica de C. Astrada (1956). Para Virasoro la obra representaba un posicionamiento lógico contrapuesto al formal con derivaciones gnoseológicas y metafísicas; para Astrada ella exponía la fundamentación del método dialéctico, el cual tenía relevancia ontológica y política. Ambos filósofos coincidieron en un interés crítico por la obra y en un privilegio exegético de la Doctrina del ser por sobre la Esencia y el Concepto. Las diferencias y las continuidades entre ambas interpretaciones conformaron la recepción inicial de la Wissenschaft der Logik en la filosofía argentina. ARFIL y UNL 2021-08-20 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion artículo Articulo info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo application/pdf https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/10196 10.14409/topicos.v0i42.10196 Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe; Núm. 42 (2021): Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe; 52-78 Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe; No 42 (2021): Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe; 52-78 1668-723X 1666-485X 10.14409/topicos.v0i42 spa info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/ https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/10196/14151 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Derechos de autor 2021 Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe
institution Universidad Nacional del Litoral
collection Publicaciones periódicas
language spa
format Artículo revista
description The reception of G. W. F. Hegel's Wissenschaft der Logik in Argentine philosophy was late and focal. The almost null attention to the speculative aspect of Hegelian philosophy during nineteenth-century positivism was followed by a superficial interest in the first decades of the twentieth century, which resulted in two commentaries on the Wissenschaft der Logik: La Lógica de Hegel by M. A. Virasoro (1932) and Hegel y la dialéctica by C. Astrada (1956). For Virasoro the work represented a logical position opposed to the formal one with gnoseological and metaphysical derivations; for Astrada it exposed the foundation of the dialectical method, which had ontological and political relevance. Both philosophers coincided in a critical interest in the work and in an exegetical privilege of the Doctrine of Being over the Essence and the Concept. The differences and continuities between the two interpretations shaped the initial reception of the Wissenschaft der Logik in Argentine philosophy.
author Figueredo Núñez, Hugo Alberto
spellingShingle Figueredo Núñez, Hugo Alberto
The Reception of the Wissenschaft der Logik in the Argentinean philosophy (1932 - 1956)
author_facet Figueredo Núñez, Hugo Alberto
author_sort Figueredo Núñez, Hugo Alberto
title The Reception of the Wissenschaft der Logik in the Argentinean philosophy (1932 - 1956)
title_short The Reception of the Wissenschaft der Logik in the Argentinean philosophy (1932 - 1956)
title_full The Reception of the Wissenschaft der Logik in the Argentinean philosophy (1932 - 1956)
title_fullStr The Reception of the Wissenschaft der Logik in the Argentinean philosophy (1932 - 1956)
title_full_unstemmed The Reception of the Wissenschaft der Logik in the Argentinean philosophy (1932 - 1956)
title_sort reception of the wissenschaft der logik in the argentinean philosophy (1932 - 1956)
publisher ARFIL y UNL
publishDate 2021
url https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/10196
_version_ 1733712098982100992
score 11.8626

Ejemplares similares